to the objection that it would be a pity
for him, on his return, fresh from first-hand study of GPO methods, to be immediately given an Acting Appoint-
ment elsewhere. As to his request for full pay if he works at the G.P.O. when he comes back from leave, refer to the rule laid down in the case of Mr. Badeley; and refuse it.
I do not think we should for a moment consider the supposed financial grievance: Commander Hastings is, after all, a bit of an acquisition in the HK service and has received very substantial promotion - his salary as Harbour Master being $3,000, and his salary as $6,950 + £100.
It is also worth noting that in similar circumstances, Mr. Badeley was refused full pay. (See letter on 12089/9).
As to his request for full pay if he works at the G.P.O. when he comes back from leave, refer to the rule laid down in the case of Mr. Badeley; and refuse it on the same grounds.
[If ever the £100 paid to him by the G.P.O. is withdrawn, we will reconsider the question of his salary.]
I think he ought to be told that the conditions under which he was offered the appointment cannot be modified.
This should be in line with the general rule that was laid down that full pay was not given to Colonial Officials who spent a portion of their leave in acquiring knowledge connected with their official duties.
The case of Mr. Ladds is similar; he was given extra pay, but it was half pay, and he entered with 2393/90.
Page 25
J & L (x)~~12435~~-~2000-1-99
16193-2000-4-99
AF-25
25 puf
abul
Page 25
GR1178/1922/32(III)
XCR(85)72
a
to the objection that it would be a pity
for him, on his retum, fresh from first-hand study of GPO methods, to be umidiately given an Acting Aff
elsewhere.
all a
I do not think we should for a moment consider the suffered financial grevance: Commander Hastings is, afte bit of an actrice in the HK service
received very substantial promotion _ his salay as Harbour Master
being $3,000, and his salary $6.950 +£100.
and has
$4,4
t
at
PMC
its to his hunt for special full
G.P.D., we hoy leave to study at the 8.0.0.,
may ignore it; but it
that
under
(See lettin
this
Amer
manu
te as well to note
refused to th. Badeley
halimilar circumstances.
"See letter on 12089/9),
12089/921
yes- Ew
? As to his request for full pay if he
works at the G.1.0. when he comes leave, refer to the rube laid dowry in the case of M. Badeby; and refuse
on
and
the second and third requests 11
[ Ifever the £100 haid him by
we w
othing have
the G.1.0. is with drawn,
reconsider the question ofhis
Gus 25!7
to
salary. I
(AF
You. I think he ought to be bold
that the conditions under which
he was offered the appointment Cannot be modified
CPF
25
So pround & segnothing
This shout
the leave
on which ageneral to motid
rule was laid down that full pay was not
geven to Colonial Officiel who
spent a portion of their leave in acquiring knowledge connected with them official
of Mr. Ladds
duties. The
Case
similar; he was, it is
is
ustvey
it is the given extration 22342/2
but it was half hay, and he entered with 2393/90-
iband to camit & further resident
#
service.
A.F-251
J & L (x)~~12435~~-~2000-1-99
16193-2000-4-99
atmu
Ew 25
25 puf
abul
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.